By reenee, Santa Maria
Reading about the
riots over caricatures of Mohammed I got to thinking about what exactly defines an extremist, or a terrorist.
Extremism is of course going to great or exaggerated lengths, exceeding the ordinary, usual, or expected to make a point, while
terrorism is the systematic use of terror as a means of coercion. Which of these defines the individuals rioting in the Middle East? People have been rioting, fire bombing and burning buildings in those countries for weeks now over what they percieve as blasphemy, and instead of lessening over time, they seem to be gaining momentum. It was almost laughable to hear Condo Rice say that the rioters "
might spin out of control." These people are already angry, so to hear her also suggest that "they ought to organize peacefully" was not helpful. These are people that gather by the millions for the
annual hajj. They all believe that each one of them, at least once in their lives, must take part in the pilgrimage. At the
stoning of the devil ritual, the massive crowd is so out of control that hundreds end up dying in a stampede, yet they all attend the following year. Anyone saying that they should gather peacefully to protest is seriously out of touch. These people take their religion and their prophet very seriously. Does anyone wonder why the rioters are now
targeting the west? We don't have to agree with this behavior to try to understand it enough to quit making bizarre suggestions.
As I continued reading the news, the nine
church bombings in Alabama and Mississippi since February 2nd, reminded me that we have our own terrorists and extremists in this country. Who could be bombing those churches? Perhaps extremists, terrorists, idiots? Some of these churches have black members, some have white members. I guess that the person or persons responsible for this dabble in equal opportunity hatred and intolerance. Whoever is doing this surely feels justified in some way. Apparently, believing that you have a one-way ticket to the hereafter where you'll be fed peeled grapes by seven virgins is not a requirement to be a terrorist. When and if we ever find out the reasons for destroying these churches, will it make a difference in stopping this kind of behavior? Probably not. We cannot control thoughts, despite the last general election results. We can have gun control laws, but people will still rampage through post offices, other places of business and schools. We can prosecute vigorously any and all hate crimes, but people will still seek out some ethnic group to bully, attack or kill. People will simply continue to think and do things that they feel justified in thinking or doing to others that do not fit their idea of "what is right" in their minds. So, while we might discover that organized terrorists or extremists are bombing churches, we might also discover that these "terrorists" are idiots with too much time on their hands.
Another excellent yet disturbing example of home grown extremism/terrorism is the
Westboro Baptist Church. These people do not toss bombs at churches, nor do they shoot at people, that we know of. They are however extremists and terrorists. They like to stand outside of churches with signs that advertise hatred, intolerance and ignorance. Yep, this shining example is
Fred Phelps. The Reverend Phelps is the leader of the virulently homophobic Westboro Baptist Church, in Topeka, Kansas. His church has about 100 members, and of those, at least 90 of them are related to him through blood or marriage. This scary guy has a website that claims to have staged "20,000" protests across the nation and around the world in the last decade. At the funeral of murder victim
Matthew Shepard, they held up signs reading "No Fags in Heaven" and "God Hates Fags." He not only told the mourners that Matthew went to Hell, but that they would be there to join him when they died. It's obvious that hatred and intolerance motivates this guy. His church website is: Godhatesfags.com. He also has a website named: Godhatesamerica.com, where he contends that the United States is "doomed" because it supports gays. According to Fred Phelps, "God invented the Internet for us to preach on." They also demonstrated at
the funerals of the miners killed at the Sago Mine. They held signs that said these men were killed because our government tolerates homosexuals. These people call themselves Christians. Hey Fred, what would Jesus do? Lest you think I'm making this stuff up,
go here.
How about someone like
Eric Robert Rudolph? Rudolph is described as an American Christian terrorist who committed a series of bombings across the southern United States, murdering three people and injuring at least 150 others. Yep, he was the
Olympic Bomber. Rudolph declared his bombings as part of a guerrilla campaign against abortion, "the homosexual agenda" and perceived support for them from the United States government. Rudolph purports to have committed his crimes for religious reasons.
Then there's
Timothy McVeigh. Would he qualify? Well maybe, the FBI describes him as an "American domestic terrorist." He did blow up a building that 167 people died in, children, men and women. How does anyone get to that point? People from all walks of life say that there is no room in a civilized nation for terrorism, yet here we are. We have our own versions of extremists and terrorists here, yet when people think of terrorists or extremists, they look to September 11th, or the USS Cole or the rioters in the Middle East.
Reading about the riots over caricatures of Mohammed I got to thinking about what exactly defines an extremist, or a terrorist. Extremism is of course going to great or exaggerated lengths, exceeding the ordinary, usual, or expected to make a point, while terrorism is the systematic use of terror as a means of coercion. Which of these defines the individuals rioting in the Middle East? People have been rioting, fire bombing and burning buildings in those countries for weeks now over what they percieve as blasphemy, and instead of lessening over time, they seem to be gaining momentum. It was almost laughable to hear Condo Rice say that the rioters "might spin out of control." These people are already angry, so to hear her also suggest that "they ought to organize peacefully" was not helpful. These are people that gather by the millions for the annual hajj. They all believe that each one of them, at least once in their lives, must take part in the pilgrimage. At the stoning of the devil ritual, the massive crowd is so out of control that hundreds end up dying in a stampede, yet they all attend the following year. Anyone saying that they should gather peacefully to protest is seriously out of touch. These people take their religion and their prophet very seriously. Does anyone wonder why the rioters are now targeting the west? We don't have to agree with this behavior to try to understand it enough to quit making bizarre suggestions.
As I continued reading the news, the nine church bombings in Alabama and Mississippi since February 2nd, reminded me that we have our own terrorists and extremists in this country. Who could be bombing those churches? Perhaps extremists, terrorists, idiots? Some of these churches have black members, some have white members. I guess that the person or persons responsible for this dabble in equal opportunity hatred and intolerance. Whoever is doing this surely feels justified in some way. Apparently, believing that you have a one-way ticket to the hereafter where you'll be fed peeled grapes by seven virgins is not a requirement to be a terrorist. When and if we ever find out the reasons for destroying these churches, will it make a difference in stopping this kind of behavior? Probably not. We cannot control thoughts, despite the last general election results. We can have gun control laws, but people will still rampage through post offices, other places of business and schools. We can prosecute vigorously any and all hate crimes, but people will still seek out some ethnic group to bully, attack or kill. People will simply continue to think and do things that they feel justified in thinking or doing to others that do not fit their idea of "what is right" in their minds. So, while we might discover that organized terrorists or extremists are bombing churches, we might also discover that these "terrorists" are idiots with too much time on their hands.
Another excellent yet disturbing example of home grown extremism/terrorism is the Westboro Baptist Church. These people do not toss bombs at churches, nor do they shoot at people, that we know of. They are however extremists and terrorists. They like to stand outside of churches with signs that advertise hatred, intolerance and ignorance. Yep, this shining example is Fred Phelps. The Reverend Phelps is the leader of the virulently homophobic Westboro Baptist Church, in Topeka, Kansas. His church has about 100 members, and of those, at least 90 of them are related to him through blood or marriage. This scary guy has a website that claims to have staged "20,000" protests across the nation and around the world in the last decade. At the funeral of murder victim Matthew Shepard, they held up signs reading "No Fags in Heaven" and "God Hates Fags." He not only told the mourners that Matthew went to Hell, but that they would be there to join him when they died. It's obvious that hatred and intolerance motivates this guy. His church website is: Godhatesfags.com. He also has a website named: Godhatesamerica.com, where he contends that the United States is "doomed" because it supports gays. According to Fred Phelps, "God invented the Internet for us to preach on." They also demonstrated at the funerals of the miners killed at the Sago Mine. They held signs that said these men were killed because our government tolerates homosexuals. These people call themselves Christians. Hey Fred, what would Jesus do? Lest you think I'm making this stuff up, go here.
How about someone like Eric Robert Rudolph? Rudolph is described as an American Christian terrorist who committed a series of bombings across the southern United States, murdering three people and injuring at least 150 others. Yep, he was the Olympic Bomber. Rudolph declared his bombings as part of a guerrilla campaign against abortion, "the homosexual agenda" and perceived support for them from the United States government. Rudolph purports to have committed his crimes for religious reasons.
Then there's Timothy McVeigh. Would he qualify? Well maybe, the FBI describes him as an "American domestic terrorist." He did blow up a building that 167 people died in, children, men and women. How does anyone get to that point? People from all walks of life say that there is no room in a civilized nation for terrorism, yet here we are. We have our own versions of extremists and terrorists here, yet when people think of terrorists or extremists, they look to September 11th, or the USS Cole or the rioters in the Middle East.
